考研英語閱讀真題解析

時間：2024-10-30 18:44:30 英語閱讀

考研英語閱讀真題解析

　　考驗英語閱讀理解主要考查考生理解主旨要義、具體信息、概念性含義，進行有關的判斷、推理和引申，根據上下文推測生詞的詞義等能力。下面是小編給大家收集了考研的英語閱讀真題以及解析，一起來練習一下吧!

考研英語閱讀真題解析

　　第一篇：

　　“There is on and only one social responsibility of business,” wrote Milton Friedman, a Nobel prize-winning economist, “That is, to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” But even if you accept Friedman’s premise and regard corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies as a waste of shareholders’ money, things may not be absolutely clear-cut. New research suggests that CSR may create monetary value for companies-at least when they are prosecuted for corruption.

　　The largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimate by EPG, a consulting firm. This could add value to their businesses in three ways. First, consumers may take CSR spending as a “signal” that a company’s products are of high quality. Second, customers may be willing to buy a company’s products as an indirect way to donate to the good causes it helps. And third, through a more diffuse “halo effect,” whereby its good deeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and others.

　　Previous studies on CSR have had trouble differentiating these effects because consumers can be affected by all three. Al recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions under America’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a company’s products as part of their investigations, they could be influenced only by the halo effect.

　　The study found that, among prosecuted firms, those with the most comprehensive CSR programmes tended to get more lenient penalties,. Their analysis ruled out the possibility that it was firm’s political influence, rather than their CSR stand, that accounted for the leniency: Companies that contributed more to political campaigns did not receive lower fines.

　　In all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to be influenced by a company’s record in CSR. “We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labour-rights concern , such as child labour, or increasing corporate giving byabout20% results in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typical punishment for bribing foreign officials”, says one researcher.

　　Researchers admit that their study does not answer the question of how much businesses ought to spend on CSR. Nor does it reveal how much companies are banking on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when they decide their do-gooding policies. But at least they have demonstrated that when companies get into trouble with the law, evidence of good character can win them less costly punishment.

　　31.The author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with

　　【A】tolerance.

　　【B】skepticism.

　　【C】uncertainty.

　　【D】approval.

　　32.According to Paragraph 2,CSR helps a company by

　　【A】winning trust from consumers.

　　【B】guarding it against malpractices.

　　【C】protecting it from being defamed.

　　【D】raising the quality of its products.

　　33. The expression “more lenient ”(line 2,para.4)is closest in meaning to

　　【A】more effective

　　【B】less controversial

　　【C】less severe

　　【D】more lasting

　　34. When prosecutors evaluate a case, a company’s CSR regard

　　【A】has an impact on their decision

　　【B】comes across as reliable evidence

　　【C】increases the chance of being penalized

　　【D】constitutes part of the investigation

　　35.Which of the following is true of CSR, according to the last paragraph?

　　【A】 Its negative effects on businesses are often overlooked.

　　【B】 The necessary amount of companies’ spending on it is unknown.

　　【C】 Companies’ financial capacity for it has been overestimated.

　　【D】 It has brought much benefit to the banking industry.

　　第二篇：

　　Biologists estimate that as many as 2 million lesser prairie chickens---a kind of bird living on stretching grasslands—once lent red to the often gray landscape of the midwestern and southwestern United States. But just some 22,000 birds remain today, occupying about 16% of the species’ historic range.

　　The crash was a major reason the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)decided to formally list the bird as threatened. “The lesser prairie chicken is in a desperate situation,” said USFWS Director Daniel Ashe. Some environmentalists, however, were disappointed. They had pushed the agency to designate the bird as “endangered,” a status that gives federal officials greater regulatory power to crack down on threats. But Ashe and others argued that the“threatened” tag gave the federal government flexibility to try out new, potentially less confrontational conservations approaches. In particular, they called for forging closer collaborations with western state governments, which are often uneasy with federal action and with the private landowners who control an estimated 95% of the prairie chicken’s habitat.

　　Under the plan, for example, the agency said it would not prosecute landowner or businesses that unintentionally kill, harm, or disturb the bird, as long as they had signed a range—wide management plan to restore prairie chicken habitat. Negotiated by USFWS and the states, the plan requires individuals and businesses that damage habitat as part of their operations to pay into a fund to replace every acre destroyed with 2 new acres of suitable habitat. The fund will also be used to compensate landowners who set aside habitat, USFWS also set an interim goal of restoring prairie chicken populations to an annual average of 67,000 birds over the next 10 years. And it gives the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA), a coalition of state agencies, the job of monitoring progress. Overall, the idea is to let “states” remain in the driver’s seat for managing the species，” Ashe said.

　　Not everyone buys the win-win rhetoric Some Congress members are trying to block the plan, and at least a dozen industry groups, four states, and three environmental groups are challenging it in federal court Not surprisingly, doesn’t go far enough “The federal government is giving responsibility for managing the bird to the same industries that are pushing it to extinction,” says biologist Jay Lininger.

　　26. The major reason for listing the lesser prairie as threatened is____

　　[A]its drastically decreased population

　　[B]the underestimate of the grassland acreage

　　[C]a desperate appeal from some biologists

　　[D]the insistence of private landowners

　　27.The “threatened” tag disappointed some environmentalists in that it_____

　　[A]was a give-in to governmental pressure

　　[B]would involve fewer agencies in action

　　[C]granted less federal regulatory power

　　[D]went against conservation policies

　　28.It can be learned from Paragraph3 that unintentional harm-doers will not be prosecuted if they_____

　　[A]agree to pay a sum for compensation

　　[B]volunteer to set up an equally big habitat

　　[C]offer to support the WAFWA monitoring job

　　[D]promise to raise funds for USFWS operations

　　29.According to Ashe， the leading role in managing the species in______

　　[A]the federal government

　　[B]the wildlife agencies

　　[C]the landowners

　　[D]the states

　　30.Jay Lininger would most likely support_______

　　[A]industry groups

　　[B]the win-win rhetoric

　　[C]environmental groups

　　[D]the plan under challenge

　　答案解析請見第二頁：

　　>>>>>>答案解析<<<<<<

　　第一篇：

　　31 答案 B Skepticism

　　解析：作者觀點態度題。題干問的是作者對有關CSR方面Milton Friedman的說法是什么態度。根據大寫Milton Friedman這個人定位到定位到首段首句。注意題干問的是作者的看法，因此定位到后一句but轉折處。轉折處的主題句式“things may not absolutely clear-cut”，作者持的是否定態度，選擇答案B。C選項是作者態度不明確，不能選擇。

　　32 答案 A winning trust from consumers

　　解析：根據題干找到第二段.根據第二段內容,CSR could add value to their business in three ways. 從而定位下面三點。First后面出現了high quality，但是它是在從句中，從句修飾"signal",而本句謂語動詞是take，與D中 raising 并不是同義詞，故排除。Second,和third 都與消費者購買心態有關，和A選項 winning trust from consumers 相對應。而B，C選項的malpractices和defamed在原文中并未出現，且沒有同義詞，故排除。

　　33 答案 C less severe

　　解析：根據題干找到第四段對應處。可見題干的 more lenient 是作為修飾 penalties(懲罰) 的，故推測本句在討論 CSR 和 penalties 有什么聯系。而本段與懲罰相關的詞只有最后一個詞 fines(罰金)，修飾它的形容詞是lower, 故可推測 more lenient 與降低懲罰有關，只有C選項滿足。

　　34 答案 A has an impact on their decision

　　解析：題干中問的是 CSR record 與 prosecutors evaluate a case 的關系，根據題干內容到對應點：第五段第一句。本句說，...they do seem to be influenced by a company's recore in CSR.這里的 be influenced 與A選項 has an impact 對應，故選A. 而B選項中的 reliable evidence, C 選項中的 the chance of being penalized 在原文中沒有體現。D選項中的 investigation 與題干中的 When prosecutors evaluate a case 明顯對應不上，故不予考慮。

　　35 答案 B The necessary amount of companies’ spending on it is unknown

　　解析：該題是一道判斷題，題干問的是有關CSR哪個是對的。先根據CSR回到最后一段，定位到末段首句。首句提到“研究人員承認到其研究沒有回答如下問題：公司應該在CSR方面花費多少錢”。選項B的意思是公司在其方面的花費是未知的，屬于原文的同義替換。

　　第二篇：

　　26 答案 A its drastically decreased population

　　解析：此題是原因細節題。根據關鍵詞定位到第一段But前后關于lesser prairie chickens 數量2million和22,000的強烈對比。此外第二段第二句“the lesser prairie chicken is in a desperate situation”都可以得知A its drastically decreased population 數量的急劇下降為正確答案。

　　27 答案 C granted less federal regulatory powers

　　解析：此題是原因細節題。根據關鍵詞定位到第二段第四句，They had …, a state that gives federal officials greater regulatory power. 而But 之后是截然相反的事實，即政府授予了更少的管理權。故而C granted less federal regulatory powers為正確答案。

　　28 答案 A agree to pay a sum for compensation

　　解析：推斷題。題干問的是從第三段推出來：無意傷害的那些人是不會被檢舉的如果怎么樣。根據題干定位到第三段首句“it would not prosecute….as long as ….”，題干中問的if即原文的as long as的同意替換，原文as long as的意思是：只要他們簽署了計劃。下一句說道，該計劃要求個體和企業去支付基金。對應選項A選項“贊同支付賠償”屬于同義替換。

　　29 答案 D the states

　　解析：此題是細節題。根據關鍵詞定位到第三段最后一句the idea is to let the“states”remain in the driver’s seat for managing the species, Ashe said. 其中in the driver’s seat對應題干中的the leading role, 故而D states為正確答案。

　　30 答案 C environmental groups

　　解析：文中人物觀點題。題干問的是Jay Lininger最可能支持誰，大寫人名定位到末段最后一句。最后一句提到：生物學家Jay Lininger說道聯邦政府要把責任推給導致鳥類滅絕的企業，顯然是對政府和企業的反對。再往前看一句，指出：企業團體和政府部門觀點一致，環境學家與其觀點恰巧一致。因此，Jay Lininger最支持環境團體的觀點了。

【考研英語閱讀真題解析】相關文章：