2016公共英語三級翻譯解析及譯文參考
公共英語三級翻譯中，首先要注意的在不同語境中詞的語義也不同。下面是yjbys網(wǎng)小編為大家提供的關于公共英語三級翻譯句子解析及范文參考。
1、He is famous for vigorously opposing the use of chemicals to kill pets.
這個句子中重點解析的是 vigorously opposing 并翻譯這句話。
注意的詞語：vigorously opposing積極反對
翻譯為：他因為積極反對用化學品殺寵物而出名。
2、What would you recommend for a tenth-grader?
這個句子中重點解析的是tenth-grader到底是十年級的學生，還是十歲的小孩?
tenth-grade是“十年級”，所以tenth-grader當然是“十年紀的學生”了。十歲的小孩是：teenager
3、They used Singapore as a microcosm for examining a regionwide tropical biodiversity crisis,
這個句子中重點解析的是and compiled population data from the past two centuries.
翻譯為：他們用新加坡作為檢查熱帶地區(qū)的區(qū)域性的生活差異危機一個縮影，并用過去兩個世紀(的歷史)來編纂人口數(shù)據(jù)。
其中biodiversity是由前綴bio-和diversity組合而成的，意思是生命的差異性。
4、Animals that call the forest home have suffered enormously.
這個句子中重點解析的是"call"在這句話的意思。
call稱為，當作。
翻譯為：以森林為家的動物們受到了巨大的災難。
5、American and Europe will pool research into hydrogen-powered fuel cells.
這個句子中重點解析的是"pool"在這句話的意思。
pool集中投入，pool的名詞意思是“池塘”，動詞本義是“匯合成塘”的意思，這里用的是比喻義，想象一下不難理解的。
翻譯為：美國和歐洲將集中注資到氫燃料電池的研究中。
6、It shows the United States is out to make peace with eco-friendly Europe.
翻譯為：這表明美國將盡力與生態(tài)環(huán)境好的歐洲和平相處。
out這里是副詞，表示“致力于”。
7、Fuel cells create electricity by combining oxygen and hydrogen without broducing harmful emissions, and technical construction poses few basic challenges.
這個句子中重點解析的是"call"在這句話的意思。
翻譯為：燃料電池通過氧氣和氫氣反應來發(fā)電而不發(fā)出有害物質(zhì)，并且在技術的組建上提出了很少的挑戰(zhàn)。
這里沒有call,只有cell,是電池的意思，名詞。pose challenge提出挑戰(zhàn)，就是指技術上的難關。
8、That means making use of renewable resources for the task, say wind and solar resources.
這個句子中重點解析的是"say"在這句話的意思。
翻譯為：那意味著該任務是要利用可再生資源，比如風能和太陽能。
其中的say是副詞，比如，相當于for example.
9、Whitman assured the public that the air was safe before testing was conclusive. In addition, all EPA statements were required to be screened by the White House.
翻譯為：惠特曼向公眾保證在測試下結論之前空氣是安全的。而且，所有的EPA(美國環(huán)保署)申明都要求經(jīng)過白宮的篩選。
注意的詞語：screen：動詞，篩選/過濾。
10、But New York Sen.(senator,參議員。)Hillary Clinton is calling for an investigation, saying somebody surely leaned on the EPA to lie, which Whitman strongly denies.
翻譯為：但是紐約的科學家希拉里.克林頓要求調(diào)查此事，說某些人明顯的偏向于EPA(美國環(huán)保署)而說謊，對于這個，惠特曼堅決否認。
注意的詞語：call for:相當于demand,require、lean on:偏向于。
練習:
When it comes to air pollution, the simple life isn’t necessarily the safest. The most poisonous atmosphere in Asia is found not in rapidly modernizing cities like New Delhi or Beijing but inside the kitchens of homes in rural Asia. Millions of families in the countryside heat their abodes and cook with open fires using cheap fuels that belch carbon monoxide and other noxious fumes at level up to 500 times international safety limits. Rural women and children often spend hours each day in poorly, ventilated kitchens, breathing this putrid air. “This is a problem that has been around forever, as long as humankind has existed, but it’s been ignored,” says Eva Rehfuess, a World Health Organization expert on indoor air pollution. “If you walked into these kitchens, your eyes would start tearing and you would find it difficult to breathe. It’s terrible. ”
The WHO estimates that indoor air pollution cause 1.6 million deaths per year in developing countries around the world, up to 555,000 of which occur in India alone-and overwhelmingly it’s the poor who are dying. Villagers have no choice but to use wood, coal or dung fires, raising the risk that young children will be killed by carboj-monoxide poisoning or a bad case of pneumonia ravaging weakened lungs. Likewise, the women who typically keep their home fires burning are vulnerable to chronic respiratory diseases. “Day in and day out for 50 years, some of these women might be cooking six hours a day, exposed to pollutions,” says Rehfuess.
Curtailing indoor air pollution can be as simple as replacing open wood fires with better-ventilated cookstoves, but more sophisticated stoves can cost up to $120. China and India, home to the world’s largest rural populations, have launched ambitious national programs in recent decades to supply villagers with safer stoves at subsidized prices. But the programs have not always worked, in India, for example, some 33 million stoves were given out free to villagers in rural areas from 1984 to 2000—but because of a lack of health education or follow-up maintenance, most families abandoned the cookstoves for their old fires within a few years.
That’s left nongovernmental organizations like the shell Foundation to step into the gap. It has begun a pilot program with local Indian NGOs in a pair of rural states to develop and market clean, wood-burning stoves that cost just $5-$10 yet can reduce emissions by up to 40%. The project is on track to sell 1000,000 stoves by the end of 2005, and the groups plan to expand the program nationally in the future. Program manager Karen Westley says Shell and its partner NGOs made an effort to sell their customers not just more efficient tools but also the idea that different is better. “You have to make sure people actually want that damn thing,” says Westely. “They need to make the connection between having a better stove, breathing less smoke and experiencing better health in the end.”
But habits ingrained by tradition can be hard to break. “They’ve been living with this always, and so have their mothers and grandmothers,” says Rehfuess. “You have to give people the felling they can do something about it.” And that they’ll breathe a lot easier for their trouble.
參考譯文:
說到空氣污染，并不是說簡單的日常生活就必然是最安全的。研究顯示，在亞洲，毒氣最濃的空氣 并不在新德里和北京這樣的現(xiàn)代化速度很快的城市，而是在亞洲農(nóng)村家庭的廚房里。在農(nóng)村，上百萬的家庭用明火取暖或是做飯，他們使用的是廉價的燃料，這些燃料所釋放的一氧化碳量和其他有毒霧量是國際標準的500倍。農(nóng)村地區(qū)的婦女和孩子經(jīng)常每天在通風不好的廚房里待上幾個小時，呼吸這種有毒的空氣。“這個問 題從人類誕生以來就一直存在著，但是卻一直被忽視了，”一位名叫伊娃.瑞弗絲的世界衛(wèi)生組織室內(nèi)空氣污染方面的專家說道，“走進廚房你的眼睛就開始流淚，而且你會覺得呼吸困難，這太可怕了。”
世界衛(wèi)生組織估計，在發(fā)展中國家，室內(nèi)空氣污染造成每年160萬人死亡，其中印度占55萬——而且死亡的大部分都是窮人。村民們除了用木頭，煤或者 是糞肥來燒火之外別無選擇，這樣會增加小孩子一氧化碳中毒死亡的危險，肺功能減弱，肺炎得病率增加。同樣，那些在家里生火的婦女很容易得慢性呼吸道疾病。瑞弗絲說“有些婦女一天要花6小時做飯，五十年里日復一日，每天都生活在污染中。”
減少室內(nèi)空氣污染其實非常簡單，只要用一套通風比較好的廚灶來代替木頭生火就可以了，但是比較高級的廚灶要花120美元。中國和印度是世界上兩個農(nóng)村地區(qū)人口最多的國家，在最近幾十年里啟動了全國范圍的救助項目，以補貼價格供給農(nóng)村居民安全性能最好的廚灶。但是，這個項目并不是一直起作用。例如，印 度政府在1984-2000年間免費發(fā)放了三百三十萬套灶給農(nóng)村地區(qū)農(nóng)民，但是由于缺少健康知識教育和相關維護，多數(shù)家庭幾年之后就又回到他們原來的取火方式了。
這使得一些像謝爾基金會這樣的非政府組織參與進來。該組織與印度當?shù)胤钦M織在一些鄉(xiāng)村地區(qū)開始小規(guī)模實驗項目，開發(fā)和推廣干凈的、燃燒木頭的廚 灶，并使之市場化。這樣廚灶可以減少40%的氧化排放量，并且只需要5-10美元。這個項目計劃到2005年底出售15套廚灶，該組織準備今后在全國范圍 內(nèi)推廣這個項目。該項目的經(jīng)理凱溫.威斯特里說謝爾和它的非政府組織合作伙伴努力銷售給顧客的不光是一種最高效的工具，而且還有一種理念，那就是：有所改 變會更好。威斯特里說：“你必須要確定人們確實想要那東西與他們最終需要的聯(lián)系，即在擁有一套好的廚灶，少呼吸煙霧和體驗到健康的身體這三者之間建立一種聯(lián)系。”
但是根深蒂固的傳統(tǒng)習慣很難改變。瑞弗絲說：“他們一直是這樣生活的，包括他們的母親和祖母也是這樣生活的，你需要給他們一種感覺，那就是他們可以對此做些改變。”這樣人們會對自己的麻煩事感到輕松許多。
【公共英語三級翻譯解析及譯文參考】相關文章：
全國公共英語三級常見語法解析01-22
公共英語三級01-21
公共英語三級題型03-27
公共英語三級寫作經(jīng)典案例03-08
公共英語三級作文范例01-22